Felder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Felder v. State

767 So. 2d 1267, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12324, 2000 WL 1397513

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1717·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions. Defendant misplaces his reliance on Conner v. State, 748 So.2d 950 (Fla.1999)(elderly adult hearsay exception facially unconstitutional),- cert denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2719, 147 L.Ed.2d 984 (2000), when, as here, the victims testified at trial under oath, and were subject to extensive cross-examination. Any error in admitting the victims’ cumulative hearsay statements was entirely harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions. Defendant misplaces his reliance on Conner v. State, 748 So.2d 950 (Fla.1999)(elderly adult hearsay exception facially unconstitutional),- cert denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2719, 147 L.Ed.2d 984 (2000), when, as here, the victims testified at trial under oath, and were subject to extensive cross-examination. Any error in admitting the victims’ cumulative hearsay statements was entirely harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Felder v. State, 767 So. 2d 1267, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12324, 2000 WL 1397513 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

767 So. 2d 1267 (Felder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related