Felder v. Hull

953 So. 2d 621, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4194, 2007 WL 837146
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 2007
DocketNo. 4D06-3819
StatusPublished

This text of 953 So. 2d 621 (Felder v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felder v. Hull, 953 So. 2d 621, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4194, 2007 WL 837146 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

KLEIN, J.

Petitioner was the seller under a real estate contract on which the buyer made a $10,000 deposit. After the transaction failed to close a dispute arose as to who was entitled to the deposit. The county court judge found in favor of the seller without explanation, and the buyer obtained a reversal in circuit court, despite the absence of a transcript of the testimony of the trial in county court.

In reversing and holding that the buyer was entitled to the return of her deposit, the circuit court ignored the contractual provision requiring the buyer to make a good faith effort to obtain the financing on which the contract was contingent. The circuit court accordingly failed to apply the correct law, which is that all provisions of a contract must be given effect. City of Homestead v. Johnson, 760 So.2d 80 (Fla.2000); Paladyne Corp. v. Weindruch, 867 So.2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). If the circuit court had applied the correct law, the lack of transcript of the testimony as to the buyer’s efforts to obtain financing would have required the circuit court to affirm the county court judgment in favor of the seller. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

Our review of the decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity is limited to whether the circuit court afforded due process or applied the correct law, Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla.1982). In this case the court failed to apply the correct law, and we accordingly grant the petition.

STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
City of Homestead v. Johnson
760 So. 2d 80 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Paladyne Corp. v. Weindruch
867 So. 2d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant
419 So. 2d 624 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
953 So. 2d 621, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4194, 2007 WL 837146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felder-v-hull-fladistctapp-2007.