Felder v. Del Rio Condominium Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Felder v. Del Rio Condominium Ass'n

221 So. 3d 775, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2017 WL 2797536

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2017·No. No. 3D17-72·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sugar v. Blek, 172 So.2d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (applying gross abuse of discretion standard in reviewing a trial court’s order vacating a default judgment); Bequer v. National City Bank, 46 So.3d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Geer v. Jacobsen, 880 So.2d 717 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (same). See also Renovaship, Inc. v. Quatremain, 208 So.3d 280, 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (observing: “The most basic requirement of procedural due process is that a party to the litigation must be provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard.” (citing State, Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Lawson v. Young, 995 So.2d 1080, 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sugar v. Blek, 172 So.2d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (applying gross abuse of discretion standard in reviewing a trial court’s order vacating a default judgment); Bequer v. National City Bank, 46 So.3d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Geer v. Jacobsen, 880 So.2d 717 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (same). See also Renovaship, Inc. v. Quatremain, 208 So.3d 280, 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (observing: “The most basic requirement of procedural due process is that a party to the litigation must be provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard.” (citing State, Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Lawson v. Young, 995 So.2d 1080, 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008))).

Felder v. Del Rio Condominium Ass'n, 221 So. 3d 775, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9388, 2017 WL 2797536 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

221 So. 3d 775 (Felder v. Del Rio Condominium Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related