Felder v. D. Loughran Co., Inc

188 F.2d 623, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 139
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 11, 1951·No. 10746_1·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued appellee and others in the District Cotirt for damages to compensate for injuries alleged to have been caused by their negligence. He alleged he was struck by an automobile which was being backed out of a parking lot owned by appellee. The other defendants were the operator and owners of the automobile. On motion the District Court dismissed the complaint insofar as it was against the appellee. The action remains pending, however, against the other defendants. Thus we have an appeal with respect to one but not all of the claims involved in the action. Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., accordingly applies. The court did not make an express determination that there is no just cause for delay and did not expressly direct the entry of judgment, as required by said Rule as a condition to the finality, and therefore the appealability, of an order which adjudicated less than all the claims. For this reason the appeal must be dismissed. David v. District of Columbia, 1950, 88 U.S.App.D.C. —, 187 F.2d 204.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felder v. D. Loughran Co., Inc, 188 F.2d 623, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 139 (D.C. Cir. 1951).

188 F.2d 623 (Felder v. D. Loughran Co., Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miguel Pons v. Republic of Cuba
288 F.2d 879 (D.C. Circuit, 1961)
Decker v. Dreisen-Freedman, Inc.
124 A.2d 311 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1956)
Durling v. Kennedy
123 A.2d 878 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1956)
Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Company
224 F.2d 198 (Second Circuit, 1955)
Rieser v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
224 F.2d 198 (Second Circuit, 1955)
Griffith v. Sandler
99 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1953)
Felder v. D. Loughran Co., Inc
196 F.2d 239 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Maizel v. Epstein
196 F.2d 44 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Vale v. Bonnett
191 F.2d 334 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)