Feldbein v. Roussov

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feldbein v. Roussov

63 A.D.3d 672, 879 N.Y.S.2d 728

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.3d 672 (Feldbein v. Roussov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feldbein v. Roussov, 63 A.D.3d 672, 879 N.Y.S.2d 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Pizzuto, J.H.O.), dated January 22, 2008, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to vacate a judgment of divorce of the same court (Giacobbe, J.) entered December 8, 2005, upon his default in answering the plaintiffs complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the hearing court’s determination that the defendant failed to establish any grounds for vacating the judgment of divorce (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1], [3], [4]; cf. Nitze v Gallagher, 138 AD2d 466 [1988]; Covello v Covello, 119 AD2d 792 [1986]; Bartal v Bartal, 117 AD2d 698, 698-699 [1986]). Accordingly, the court properly denied the defendant’s motion for that relief. Mastro, J.P, Covello, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Pizzuto, J.H.O.), dated January 22, 2008, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to vacate a judgment of divorce of the same court (Giacobbe, J.) entered December 8, 2005, upon his default in answering the plaintiffs complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the hearing court’s determination that the defendant failed to establish any grounds for vacating the judgment of divorce (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1], [3], [4]; cf. Nitze v Gallagher, 138 AD2d 466 [1988]; Covello v Covello, 119 AD2d 792 [1986]; Bartal v Bartal, 117 AD2d 698, 698-699 [1986]). Accordingly, the court properly denied the defendant’s motion for that relief. Mastro, J.P, Covello, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.3d 672, 879 N.Y.S.2d 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldbein-v-roussov-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack