Felch v. Inhabitants of West Brookfield

68 N.E. 227, 184 Mass. 309, 1903 Mass. LEXIS 1000
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 21, 1903·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Barker, J.

It being plain that the plank bridge off one end of which the plaintiff’s wheel fell, causing the injury, was not a part of the travelled path but outside of it, and constructed solely [310]*310for the purpose of facilitating access between the travelled path and a private way which opened into the highway on one side, and from which the plaintiff was driving, the case is governed by that of Kellogg v. Northampton, 4 Gray, 65, 69. See also Howard v. North Bridgewater, 16 Pick. 189; Shepardson v. Colerain, 13 Met. 55; Smith v. Wendell, 7 Cush. 498 ; Harwood v. Oakham, 152 Mass. 421; Carey v. Hubbardston, 172 Mass. 106 ; Kelley v. Boston, 180 Mass. 233.

Hxceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felch v. Inhabitants of West Brookfield, 68 N.E. 227, 184 Mass. 309, 1903 Mass. LEXIS 1000 (Mass. 1903).

68 N.E. 227 (Felch v. Inhabitants of West Brookfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trum v. Town of Paxton
109 N.E.2d 116 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1952)
Eagan v. City of Buffalo
105 Misc. 506 (New York Supreme Court, 1918)
Baxter v. Boston & Maine Railroad
104 N.E. 733 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Lynch v. City of Boston
71 N.E. 301 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)