Felber v. Southern Minnesota Railway Co.

9 N.W. 635, 28 Minn. 156, 1881 Minn. LEXIS 227

• Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota
• Decided: July 22, 1881
• Status: Published

Opinion

Clark, J.

*

This action was brought in the district court, for damages for injuries to real estate. The amount claimed in the complaint was only $68. The plaintiff had a verdict for five dollars damages. The issue of title to real estate was raised upon the pleadings, but not upon the evidence. The defendant gave notice of taxation of costs and disbursements, and the clerk taxed and allowed them at $72.40, and judgment was entered for the defendant for that amount, less the five dollars damages. The plaintiff objected before the clerk that the defendant was not entitled to costs or disbursements, claiming that he was entitled, and he caused the taxation by the clerk to be duly certified to the court, with his objections, for review. The court duly heard the matter, and made an order setting aside the taxation and allowance of costs and disbursements in favor of the defendant, and directing disbursements to be taxed in favor of the plaintiff, from which order the defendant appealed to this court.

The plaintiff moves here for a dismissal of the appeal, on the ground that the order appealed from is not an appealable order. It has been often held by this court that an order for judgment is not appealable, and it follows that an order establishing the rights of parties with respect to costs, where nothing remains to be done but to enter judgment, or to correct a judgment already entered, in pursuance of the order, is not appealable. In this case, the judgment having been entered, in accordance with the clerk’s action, in favor of the defendant, for its taxed costs and disbursements, the plaintiff’s damages being deducted therefrom, the order afterwards made amounted to a direction that such judgment be vacated, and judgment entered for the plaintiff for his damages, assessed by the jury at.five dollars, and his disbursements. The order appealed from was not a final order, and did not prevent a judgment from which an appeal might be taken; and it could only be properly reviewed, as an intermediate order, upon an appeal from the judgment entered or corrected in pursuance of it.

As the case was fully argued upon the merits, we deem it proper to add, to prevent further litigation, that we are of opinion that the defendant was entitled to its costs and disbursements in this case.

Appeal dismissed.

Dickinson, J., having made the order appealed from, took- no part in this decision.