Fejedelem v. Dimmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Fejedelem v. Dimmer

714 N.W.2d 323, 475 Mich. 872

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 30, 2006·No. 130633·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

714 N.W.2d 323 (2006) 475 Mich. 872

David E. FEJEDELEM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard DIMMER d/b/a R.D. Dimmer & Associates, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130633. COA No. 256090.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

714 N.W.2d 323 (2006) 475 Mich. 872

David E. FEJEDELEM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard DIMMER d/b/a R.D. Dimmer & Associates, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130633. COA No. 256090.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Fejedelem v. Dimmer, 714 N.W.2d 323, 475 Mich. 872 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

714 N.W.2d 323 (Fejedelem v. Dimmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

David E. FEJEDELEM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard DIMMER d/b/a R.D. Dimmer & Associates, Defendant-Appellee.

Related

David E. FEJEDELEM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard DIMMER d/b/a R.D. Dimmer & Associates, Defendant-Appellee.