Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

353 F.3d 765, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26266

Opinion

353 F.3d 765

Jerome FEITELBERG, On Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated, And The General Public, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., a Delaware Corporation; Thomas Mazzucco; Henry Blodget, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-17236.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 5, 2003 — San Francisco, California.

Filed December 24, 2003.

Solomon B. Cera, Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP, San Francisco, California, for the Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jonathan C. Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, California, for the Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-03072-MHP.

Before: Myron H. BRIGHT,* Dorothy W. NELSON, and Pamela Ann RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for reasons stated by the district court in its opinion, Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 1043 (N.D.Cal.2002).*

AFFIRMED.

Notes:

* Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation

* We deny Feitelberg's Request for Judicial Notice and Merrill Lynch's request for sanctions