Feisthamel v. State
440 N.E.2d 534, 57 N.Y.2d 696, 454 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3622
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, without costs. Even if the arbitrator refused to hear evidence of petitioners’ character or their service record, such refusal was not misconduct, for the [698]*698reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 960).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feisthamel v. State, 440 N.E.2d 534, 57 N.Y.2d 696, 454 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3622 (N.Y. 1982).
440 N.E.2d 534 (Feisthamel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Suffolk County Police Department
202 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)