Feisthamel v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Feisthamel v. State

440 N.E.2d 534, 57 N.Y.2d 696, 454 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3622

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 2, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 440 N.E.2d 534 (Feisthamel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feisthamel v. State, 440 N.E.2d 534, 57 N.Y.2d 696, 454 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3622 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, without costs. Even if the arbitrator refused to hear evidence of petitioners’ character or their service record, such refusal was not misconduct, for the [698]*698reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 960).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, without costs. Even if the arbitrator refused to hear evidence of petitioners’ character or their service record, such refusal was not misconduct, for the [698]*698reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 960).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

440 N.E.2d 534, 57 N.Y.2d 696, 454 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feisthamel-v-state-ny-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack