Feist & Feist, Inc. v. Hurley

3 A.2d 574, 121 N.J.L. 587, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 285
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 13, 1939·Published

Opinion

*588 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — -Heher, Walker, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feist & Feist, Inc. v. Hurley, 3 A.2d 574, 121 N.J.L. 587, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1939).

3 A.2d 574 (Feist & Feist, Inc. v. Hurley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.