Feist & Bachrach, Inc. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 1228, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2129
Opinion
[1230] OPINION.
The evidence as a whole is convincing that the stockholders, who withdrew from the business the amounts charged to them, respectively, never intended to repay them and that the withdrawals were intended to be and were distributions of profits. Appeal of Walle & Co., Ltd., 1 B. T. A. 1064.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feist & Bachrach, Inc. v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 1228, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2129 (bta 1925).
2 B.T.A. 1228 (Feist & Bachrach, Inc. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Appeal of Feist & Bachrach, Inc.
2 B.T.A. 1228 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)