Feinstein v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.

150 So. 2d 487, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3467
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 1963
DocketNo. 62-381
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 150 So. 2d 487 (Feinstein v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feinstein v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 150 So. 2d 487, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the plaintiff below, purchased a ticket for transportation from New York to Miami. She checked three bags and boarded the designated plane, scheduled to depart at 9:30 A.M. The plane appears to have been oversold. Plaintiff was put off. The plane departed a half hour or more late. Plaintiff’s bags were not removed. Several hours later plaintiff was furnished transportation to Miami on another line. When she arrived in Miami two • of her bags were there but the third could not be found. Plaintiff sued the defendant carrier for loss of her luggage, and sought punitive damages for inconvenience and humiliation for being removed from the plane after having been given a reservation. The trial court struck the allegations on the latter claim, and, on trial, directed a verdict for the plaintiff for $100 which was the amount of liability for the loss as specified in an applicable tariff regulation, plus $3 expended for a long distance telephone call. Plaintiff has appealed the consequent judgment. Appellant conceded the tariff limitation of $100 for loss of the bag and its contents, but contended the limitation was not applicable on the facts. The argument lacks merit. The area of transportation was not exceeded with reference to the luggage. No unusual delay occurred. The luggage preceded the passenger to the destination. The carrier’s liability continued while holding the luggage at the terminus of the trip for the several hours until the passenger arrived.1 [489]*489The trial judge was eminently correct in ruling out the claim of punitive damages for inconvenience, etc. Plaintiff’s ticket was not cancelled. Other suitable transportation was arranged and effected for her on another plane within a reasonable period. See Migoski v. Eastern Air Lines, Fla.1953, 63. So.2d 634; Lichten v. Eastern Air Lines, 2 Cir.1951, 189 F.2d 939. Cf. Navarro v. American Air Lines, 208 Misc. 127, 142 N.Y.S.2d 725.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wackenhut Corp. v. Lippert
609 So. 2d 1304 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Cantor v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
474 A.2d 839 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 So. 2d 487, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feinstein-v-northeast-airlines-inc-fladistctapp-1963.