Feinstein v. Jacobson

146 N.Y.S. 525, 161 A.D. 121

This text of 146 N.Y.S. 525 (Feinstein v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feinstein v. Jacobson, 146 N.Y.S. 525, 161 A.D. 121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The fact,that the agreement provided, in case of its violation by defendant, he should “be liable in damages and breach of contract” does not, in view of the circumstances, deprive plaintiff of the right to equitable relief. Lewis v. Gollner, 129 N. Y. 227, 234, 29 N. E. 81, 26 Am. St. Rep. 516; Diamond Match Co. v. Roeber, 106 N. Y. 473, 486, 13 N. E. 419, 60 Am. Rep. 464. Defendant’s counsel concedes that the demurrer is bad, inasmuch as it did not specify the parties failure to join whom constituted the defect. This defect in pleading could not be cured on the motion, under Code Civ. Proc. § 768.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with costs, and the demurrer overruled, with $10 costs, with leave to the defendant to withdraw the demurrer, and to answer upon payment of costs in this court and in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diamond Match Co. v. . Roeber
13 N.E. 419 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Lewis v. . Gollner
29 N.E. 81 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 N.Y.S. 525, 161 A.D. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feinstein-v-jacobson-nyappdiv-1914.