Feinstein v. Fleet Bank

280 A.D.2d 260, 719 N.Y.S.2d 854, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered May 24, 2000, which, upon the prior grant of defendant Republic National Bank’s motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint as against-it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Cross appeal from the same judgment unanimously dismissed, without costs, on the ground that defendant is not aggrieved by it.

As in Schmidt v Fleet Bank (280 AD2d 260 [decided herewith]), we need not decide whether this action is barred by Judiciary Law § 497 (7) (a), because plaintiffs have not raised questions of fact based on their allegations (see, Home Sav. v Amoros, 233 AD2d 35, 39). We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feinstein v. Fleet Bank, 280 A.D.2d 260, 719 N.Y.S.2d 854, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 260 (Feinstein v. Fleet Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Fleet Bank
280 A.D.2d 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)