Feinstein v. Banque Des Pays De L'Europe Centrale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feinstein v. Banque Des Pays De L'Europe Centrale

264 A.D. 883, 35 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 883 (Feinstein v. Banque Des Pays De L'Europe Centrale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feinstein v. Banque Des Pays De L'Europe Centrale, 264 A.D. 883, 35 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, made on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to direct the plaintiff to file a further undertaking in support of the warrant of attachment, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, to the extent of directing respondent, within ten days from the entry of the order hereon, to file additional undertaking, "with corporate surety, in the amount of $4,500. Under the facts and circumstances it cannot properly be found that the costs and damages of the defendant, if defendant be successful, would be secured by an undertaking in the [884]*884amount of $500. Appeal from the order superseded by the order made on reargument dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, made on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to direct the plaintiff to file a further undertaking in support of the warrant of attachment, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, to the extent of directing respondent, within ten days from the entry of the order hereon, to file additional undertaking, "with corporate surety, in the amount of $4,500. Under the facts and circumstances it cannot properly be found that the costs and damages of the defendant, if defendant be successful, would be secured by an undertaking in the [884]*884amount of $500. Appeal from the order superseded by the order made on reargument dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 883, 35 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feinstein-v-banque-des-pays-de-leurope-centrale-nyappdiv-1942.