Feinstein Iron Works, Inc. v. F.J. Sciame Construction Co.

7 A.D.3d 662, 776 N.Y.S.2d 841, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7050

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated September 19, 2003, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to consolidate two pending arbitrations.

[663]*663Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant established that the two pending arbitrations shared common issues of fact and law to warrant consolidation (see CPLR 602 [a]; County of Sullivan v Edward L. Nezelek, Inc., 42 NY2d 123 [1977]; Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Bailey, 251 AD2d 627 [1998]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feinstein Iron Works, Inc. v. F.J. Sciame Construction Co., 7 A.D.3d 662, 776 N.Y.S.2d 841, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 662 (Feinstein Iron Works, Inc. v. F.J. Sciame Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Sullivan v. Edward L. Nezelek, Inc.
366 N.E.2d 72 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Government Employees Insurance v. Bailey
251 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)