Feinschreiber v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feinschreiber v. Board of Education

43 A.D.2d 839, 351 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5966

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 839 (Feinschreiber v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feinschreiber v. Board of Education, 43 A.D.2d 839, 351 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant the Board of Education of the City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 10,1972, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to s.pt aside a jury verdict for said defendant and set the case down for a new trial. Order reversed, with costs, motion denied and verdict reinstated. In our opinion, the verdict was supported by the evidence and the conduct of the appealing defendant’s attorney was not of such a nature as would require a [840]*840new trial. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ.,. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant the Board of Education of the City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 10,1972, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to s.pt aside a jury verdict for said defendant and set the case down for a new trial. Order reversed, with costs, motion denied and verdict reinstated. In our opinion, the verdict was supported by the evidence and the conduct of the appealing defendant’s attorney was not of such a nature as would require a [840]*840new trial. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ.,. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 839, 351 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feinschreiber-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1974.