Feinman v. Flemming & Gibson Purchasing Co.

275 A.D.2d 1051

This text of 275 A.D.2d 1051 (Feinman v. Flemming & Gibson Purchasing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feinman v. Flemming & Gibson Purchasing Co., 275 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

It has been clearly established that the prima facie showing of the existence of a cause of action by plaintiff in her affidavit, which was proffered to the Special Term in support of her application for the warrant, was made possible only by false and unwarranted statements therein, and that plaintiff has no cause of action with respect to the merchandise which was delivered to her, any claim which she might have had having been extinguished by the agreement of settlement. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feinman-v-flemming-gibson-purchasing-co-nyappdiv-1949.