Feingold ex rel. United States v. Palmetto Government Benefits Administrators

278 F. App'x 923
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 20, 2008·No. No. 07-11170·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we readily conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. With respect to Counts III and IV of the complaint, we conclude that we are bound by our prior panel opinion in United States ex rel. Body v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., 156 F.3d 1098 (11th Cir.1998). Accordingly, defendants are immune with respect to the allegations of Counts III and IV.

With respect to Counts I and II, we conclude that the district court committed no reversible error in dismissing those counts for failure to comply with Fed. R.Civ.P. 9(b).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feingold ex rel. United States v. Palmetto Government Benefits Administrators, 278 F. App'x 923 (11th Cir. 2008).

278 F. App'x 923 (Feingold ex rel. United States v. Palmetto Government Benefits Administrators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related