Feingold Electric, Inc. v. Highbar Construction Corp.
200 N.E.2d 870, 14 N.Y.2d 938, 252 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1028
This text of 200 N.E.2d 870 (Feingold Electric, Inc. v. Highbar Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Feingold Electric, Inc. v. Highbar Construction Corp., 200 N.E.2d 870, 14 N.Y.2d 938, 252 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1028 (N.Y. 1964).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that '.he order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. If the motion were properly before it, the Court of Appeals would deny on the merits.
Motion for stay denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
200 N.E.2d 870, 14 N.Y.2d 938, 252 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feingold-electric-inc-v-highbar-construction-corp-ny-1964.