Feingold, A., Pets. v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 2016·No. 326 EAL 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

ALLEN FEINGOLD AND RUTH : No. 326 EAL 2016 WALLACE, :

:

Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court V.STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE : CO., :

:

Petitioners :

: :

v. :

: :

STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE : CO., DAVID ROHDE, LAW OFFICES OF : DAVID ROHDE, MARC RICKLES, : JOSEPH HANKINS, AND BRITT, : HANKINS & MOUGHAN, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feingold, A., Pets. v. State Farm Ins. Co., (Pa. 2016).

Feingold, A., Pets. v. State Farm Ins. Co. (Feingold, A., Pets. v. State Farm Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.