Feiner v. Office of the City Clerk
This text of 127 F. App'x 966 (Feiner v. Office of the City Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Paul Feiner appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Feiner leave to file in forma pauperis because Feiner’s action is frivolous. See id. at 617 (holding that in forma pauperis complaint may be dismissed as frivolous when it contains no arguable basis in law or fact).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 F. App'x 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feiner-v-office-of-the-city-clerk-ca9-2005.