Feinberg v. United States

D. Connecticut

Feinberg v. United States

25 F. Supp. 905, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1526

CourtDistrict Court, D. Connecticut

DecidedDecember 1, 1938

DocketNo. 3802

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 F. Supp. 905 (Feinberg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feinberg v. United States, 25 F. Supp. 905, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1526 (D. Conn. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

HINCKS, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 25 of Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 778, the petition is granted.

To be sure, it does not affirmatively appear from the allegations of the petition that the plaintiff died within two years prior thereto. .However, this fact was conceded in defendant’s brief, and it would be futile to delay the admission of the administratrix for this technical deficiency in her allegations.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HINCKS, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 25 of Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 778, the petition is granted.

To be sure, it does not affirmatively appear from the allegations of the petition that the plaintiff died within two years prior thereto. .However, this fact was conceded in defendant’s brief, and it would be futile to delay the admission of the administratrix for this technical deficiency in her allegations.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F. Supp. 905, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feinberg-v-united-states-ctd-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack