Feinberg v. United States

D. Connecticut

Feinberg v. United States

25 F. Supp. 905, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1526

District Court, D. Connecticut·Decided December 1, 1938·No. No. 3802·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HINCKS, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 25 of Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 778, the petition is granted.

To be sure, it does not affirmatively appear from the allegations of the petition that the plaintiff died within two years prior thereto. .However, this fact was conceded in defendant’s brief, and it would be futile to delay the admission of the administratrix for this technical deficiency in her allegations.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HINCKS, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 25 of Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 778, the petition is granted.

To be sure, it does not affirmatively appear from the allegations of the petition that the plaintiff died within two years prior thereto. .However, this fact was conceded in defendant’s brief, and it would be futile to delay the admission of the administratrix for this technical deficiency in her allegations.

Ordered accordingly.

Feinberg v. United States, 25 F. Supp. 905, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1526 (D. Conn. 1938).

Pincite

25 F. Supp. 905 (Feinberg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related