Feinberg v. Taylor

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Feinberg v. Taylor

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 4

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 17, 1917·No. Eq. No. 3569·Published

Opinion

TANNER, P. J.

This case is heard upon the petition of the creditor that the receiver be ordered to pay the dividend ordered by the Court without requiring from the creditor a release against said trust estate or the [5]*5trustees thereof, or any other conditions attached to .the payment of said dividend.

For complainant: A. S. & A. P. Johnson. For respondent: Wilson, Gardner & Churchill and H. B. Agard.

The decree upon which the receiver tendered payment does not appear to be a final decree releasing the receiver or the trust estate from all liability. In the absence of such a decree we do not think that the receiver can require any such release as he has insisted upon in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TANNER, P. J.

This case is heard upon the petition of the creditor that the receiver be ordered to pay the dividend ordered by the Court without requiring from the creditor a release against said trust estate or the [5]*5trustees thereof, or any other conditions attached to .the payment of said dividend.

For complainant: A. S. & A. P. Johnson. For respondent: Wilson, Gardner & Churchill and H. B. Agard.

The decree upon which the receiver tendered payment does not appear to be a final decree releasing the receiver or the trust estate from all liability. In the absence of such a decree we do not think that the receiver can require any such release as he has insisted upon in the case.

Feinberg v. Taylor, 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 4 (R.I. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 4 (Feinberg v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.