Feinberg v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feinberg v. Board of Education

51 A.D.2d 548, 378 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10795

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 548 (Feinberg v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feinberg v. Board of Education, 51 A.D.2d 548, 378 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to pay petitioner moneys earned by him for certain per diem service, which moneys had been withheld to recoup an overpayment to petitioner, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 20, 1973, which directed appellants to pay petitioner $1,092.70. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion there is no authority to support appellants’ method of recoupment. Our determination is without prejudice to the institution of a plenary suit by appellants, if they be so advised. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to pay petitioner moneys earned by him for certain per diem service, which moneys had been withheld to recoup an overpayment to petitioner, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 20, 1973, which directed appellants to pay petitioner $1,092.70. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion there is no authority to support appellants’ method of recoupment. Our determination is without prejudice to the institution of a plenary suit by appellants, if they be so advised. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 548, 378 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feinberg-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack