Fein v. Meier
65 A. 1117, 74 N.J.L. 597, 45 Vroom 597, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 172
This text of 65 A. 1117 (Fein v. Meier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fein v. Meier, 65 A. 1117, 74 N.J.L. 597, 45 Vroom 597, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 172 (N.J. 1907).
Opinion
The judgment brought before us by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon, in the Supreme Court. 42 Vroom 12.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Garret-son, Hendrickson, Swayze, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fein v. Meier
58 A. 114 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1904)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
65 A. 1117, 74 N.J.L. 597, 45 Vroom 597, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fein-v-meier-nj-1907.