Fein v. Meier
65 A. 1117, 74 N.J.L. 597, 45 Vroom 597, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 172
Opinion
The judgment brought before us by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon, in the Supreme Court. 42 Vroom 12.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Garret-son, Hendrickson, Swayze, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fein v. Meier, 65 A. 1117, 74 N.J.L. 597, 45 Vroom 597, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 172 (N.J. 1907).
65 A. 1117 (Fein v. Meier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fein v. Meier
58 A. 114 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1904)