Feillett v. Engler

8 Cal. 76, 1857 Cal. LEXIS 296
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1857·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Murray, C. J., after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, J., concurring.

We have repeatedly decided, that justices of the peace cannot entertain suits for money demands, where the amount in controversy exceeds two hundred dollars. Consent of parties cannot give a jurisdiction which the Constitution denies. It makes no difference whether the judgment was suffered voluntarily or not. It was for all purposes absolutely void, and the execution and sale under it a nullity.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feillett v. Engler, 8 Cal. 76, 1857 Cal. LEXIS 296 (Cal. 1857).

8 Cal. 76 (Feillett v. Engler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vasquez v. Vasquez
240 P.2d 319 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Bud Hoard Co. v. F. Berg & Co.
1929 OK 215 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Finders v. Bodle
78 N.W. 480 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Building v. Hardie
17 P. 229 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Depue v. Sergent
21 W. Va. 326 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)
Cramer v. McDowell
6 Colo. 369 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1882)
Crislip v. Cain
19 W. Va. 438 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)
Bradley v. Kent
22 Cal. 169 (California Supreme Court, 1863)