Feigley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation

638 A.2d 193, 536 Pa. 103, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 964
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 23, 1994
DocketPetition No. 253 M.D.Allocatur Dkt.1993
StatusPublished

This text of 638 A.2d 193 (Feigley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feigley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation, 638 A.2d 193, 536 Pa. 103, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 964 (Pa. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 1994, the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted.

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied. Insofar as the Petition for Review filed in the Commonwealth Court contained counts addressed to that court’s original jurisdiction, the Court has considered the Petitioner’s arguments as on direct appeal pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a). There being no basis for ordering the relief requested, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, [104]*104due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 723
Pennsylvania § 723(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
638 A.2d 193, 536 Pa. 103, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feigley-v-pennsylvania-board-of-probation-pa-1994.