Feigin v. HOSP. STAFFING SERV., INC.

569 So. 2d 941, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8847, 1990 WL 179108
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 1990
Docket89-2366
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 569 So. 2d 941 (Feigin v. HOSP. STAFFING SERV., INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feigin v. HOSP. STAFFING SERV., INC., 569 So. 2d 941, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8847, 1990 WL 179108 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

569 So.2d 941 (1990)

Emanuel FEIGIN, Appellant,
v.
HOSPITAL STAFFING SERVICES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 89-2366.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 21, 1990.

David K. Friedman of Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Kauffman & Tylander, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Robin Corwin Campbell of Atlas, Pearlman & Trop, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

*942 PER CURIAM.

Emanuel Feigin appeals the dismissal of his third amended complaint against Hospital Staffing Services, Inc. We affirm as to all issues.

Since appellant abandoned his fraud count in the third amended complaint, this court need not address the dismissal of the fraud count in the original complaint. Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Furthermore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to allow appellant to file a revised fourth amended complaint, Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 252 So.2d 817, 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971), cert. denied, 257 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1972) or by staying appellant's discovery depositions pending the motion to dismiss hearing. Brown v. Brown, 500 So.2d 655, 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Although Tarpon Temporary Sewer Comm., Inc. v. City of Tarpon Springs, 345 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) indicates that courts should allow leave to amend for counts asserted for the first time, we believe that the trial court was permitted to dismiss the civil theft of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty counts for failure to state a cause of action. Refusal to grant leave to amend was not an abuse of the court's discretion since this was the seventh complaint filed over a four-year period and the record clearly reflects the court's warning that this was the plaintiff's "last bite at the apple." Clay v. City of Margate, 546 So.2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 553 So.2d 1164 (1989); Cohen v. American Home Assurance Co., 367 So.2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 342 (1979).

LETTS, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Natalie Nichols v. City of Miami Beach
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Wiendl v. Hughes, Wiendl
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Rodriguez v. Recovery Performance & Marine, LLC
38 So. 3d 178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Owens v. Ridley
870 So. 2d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Lundstrom Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd.
856 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Gladstone v. Smith
729 So. 2d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Kohn v. City of Miami Beach
611 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Palomares v. Ocean Bank of Miami
574 So. 2d 1159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 So. 2d 941, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8847, 1990 WL 179108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feigin-v-hosp-staffing-serv-inc-fladistctapp-1990.