Feighan v. Sobers
80 A. 1090, 231 Pa. 463, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 867
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 24, 1911
DocketAppeal, No. 37
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 80 A. 1090 (Feighan v. Sobers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Feighan v. Sobers, 80 A. 1090, 231 Pa. 463, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 867 (Pa. 1911).
Opinion
The averments by the appellee in his affidavit on which he obtained a rule to open the judgment entered against him, taken in connection with his deposition in support of the rule, justified the court in opening the judgment and letting him into a defense. The appellant has shown nothing that requires us to say there was an abuse of the court’s discretion.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jamestown Banking Co. v. Conneaut Lake Dock & Dredge Co.
14 A.2d 325 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
80 A. 1090, 231 Pa. 463, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feighan-v-sobers-pa-1911.