Feighan v. Sobers
80 A. 1090, 231 Pa. 463, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 867
Opinion
The averments by the appellee in his affidavit on which he obtained a rule to open the judgment entered against him, taken in connection with his deposition in support of the rule, justified the court in opening the judgment and letting him into a defense. The appellant has shown nothing that requires us to say there was an abuse of the court’s discretion.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feighan v. Sobers, 80 A. 1090, 231 Pa. 463, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 867 (Pa. 1911).
80 A. 1090 (Feighan v. Sobers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jamestown Banking Co. v. Conneaut Lake Dock & Dredge Co.
14 A.2d 325 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)