Feighan v. Sobers
91 A. 1068, 86 N.J.L. 356, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 264
This text of 91 A. 1068 (Feighan v. Sobers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Feighan v. Sobers, 91 A. 1068, 86 N.J.L. 356, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 264 (N.J. 1914).
Opinion
The judgment under review heroin should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Voorjiees in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tt-te Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, T ken chard, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenheimek, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 A. 1068, 86 N.J.L. 356, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feighan-v-sobers-nj-1914.