Feigenspan v. Mulligan
53 A. 1124, 64 N.J. Eq. 792, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 212
This text of 53 A. 1124 (Feigenspan v. Mulligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Feigenspan v. Mulligan, 53 A. 1124, 64 N.J. Eq. 792, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 212 (N.J. 1902).
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Collins, Port, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgi-i, Voorhees, Vroom—13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCray v. Chrucky
173 A.2d 39 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
53 A. 1124, 64 N.J. Eq. 792, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feigenspan-v-mulligan-nj-1902.