Feigen v. Advance Capital Management Corp.
547 N.E.2d 95, 74 N.Y.2d 874, 547 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3072
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal from so much of the order sought to be appealed from as dismissed certain causes of action asserted against defendants Advance and Skelgas dismissed upon the ground the order sought to be appealed does not finally determine the action with respect to these defendants; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feigen v. Advance Capital Management Corp., 547 N.E.2d 95, 74 N.Y.2d 874, 547 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3072 (N.Y. 1989).
547 N.E.2d 95 (Feigen v. Advance Capital Management Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,739, 14 Ucc rep.serv.2d 336 J.B. Haralson, Cross-Appellants v. The E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., Cross-Appellees. The E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. George J. Aubin, Cross-Appellants
919 F.2d 1014 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
Seiden Associates, Inc. v. ANC Holdings, Inc.
754 F. Supp. 37 (S.D. New York, 1991)
Haralson v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.
919 F.2d 1014 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
Jim Bouton Corp. v. Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co.
902 F.2d 1074 (Second Circuit, 1990)
Jim Bouton Corporation v. Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company
902 F.2d 1074 (Second Circuit, 1990)