Feige v. Nokia Mobile Phones, Inc.
This text of 5 A.D.3d 348 (Feige v. Nokia Mobile Phones, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for breach of warranty, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated November 14, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). In opposition to the motion, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., H. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.3d 348, 772 N.Y.S.2d 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feige-v-nokia-mobile-phones-inc-nyappdiv-2004.