Feifer v. J. M. Horton Ice Cream Co.
This text of 242 A.D. 657 (Feifer v. J. M. Horton Ice Cream Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting motion for bill of particulars, so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; compliance with the Special Term order stayed until ten days after plaintiff completes an examination before trial in aid of such bill of particulars, if application for such examination be made within ten days from the entry of the order herein and is granted; if not so applied for or the examination be denied, the order for the bill of particulars will be affirmed without conditions. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., votes for plain affirmance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feifer-v-j-m-horton-ice-cream-co-nyappdiv-1934.