Feibleman & Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Feibleman & Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp.

4 La. App. 478, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 171

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 24, 1926

DocketNo. 10,446

StatusPublished

This text of 4 La. App. 478 (Feibleman & Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feibleman & Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp., 4 La. App. 478, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 171 (La. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

CLAIBORNE, J.

This is a suit upon a promissory note for $357.26, dated August 31, 1925, payable on October 1, 1925, made by the defendant to its own order, signed by J. W. Hodgkins, President, and likewise endorsed, with ten per cent attorney’s fees, subject to a credit of $82.26, leaving a balance due of $275.00.

Citation was served on Mr. Shroder, superintendent of defendant, on December 11, 1925. In the absence of an answer, •judgment by default was rendered on February 8, 1926, for $275.00, interest and attorney’s fees, subject' to a credit of $100.00. ■The defendant appealed.

In this court the plaintiff has not asked for an amendment of the judgment. We see no error in the judgment prejudicial to defendant, and it is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLAIBORNE, J.

This is a suit upon a promissory note for $357.26, dated August 31, 1925, payable on October 1, 1925, made by the defendant to its own order, signed by J. W. Hodgkins, President, and likewise endorsed, with ten per cent attorney’s fees, subject to a credit of $82.26, leaving a balance due of $275.00.

Citation was served on Mr. Shroder, superintendent of defendant, on December 11, 1925. In the absence of an answer, •judgment by default was rendered on February 8, 1926, for $275.00, interest and attorney’s fees, subject' to a credit of $100.00. ■The defendant appealed.

In this court the plaintiff has not asked for an amendment of the judgment. We see no error in the judgment prejudicial to defendant, and it is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 La. App. 478, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feibleman-co-v-community-burial-service-corp-lactapp-1926.