Feibelman v. Packard

Supreme Court

Feibelman v. Packard

108 U.S. 14, 1 S. Ct. 138, 27 L. Ed. 634, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1275

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 18, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 108 U.S. 14 (Feibelman v. Packard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feibelman v. Packard, 108 U.S. 14, 1 S. Ct. 138, 27 L. Ed. 634, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1275 (1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

Moses Feibelman and (George Yoelker, as .partners, sued the defendants in error to recover .damages for the seizure of their-partnership goods by Packard, marshal of the United States for the District of Louisiana. A judgment was rendered .against them. Their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately.' Feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and *15 severance, or other equivalent proceeding. It follows that the writ must he dismissed, on the authority of Williams v. Ban k of the United States, 11 Wheat. 414; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall 416; Simpson v. Greeley, 20 Wall. 152; and it is

/So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

Moses Feibelman and (George Yoelker, as .partners, sued the defendants in error to recover .damages for the seizure of their-partnership goods by Packard, marshal of the United States for the District of Louisiana. A judgment was rendered .against them. Their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately.' Feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and *15 severance, or other equivalent proceeding. It follows that the writ must he dismissed, on the authority of Williams v. Ban k of the United States, 11 Wheat. 414; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall 416; Simpson v. Greeley, 20 Wall. 152; and it is

/So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 U.S. 14, 1 S. Ct. 138, 27 L. Ed. 634, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feibelman-v-packard-scotus-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack