Fehr v. Rosenbaum
This text of 123 N.Y.S. 917 (Fehr v. Rosenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case has been once tried, and "the complaint dismissed, by a judge of the Municipal Court sitting without a jury. The judgment was reversed by the Appellate Term; the facts and reasons, sufficiently appearing in the per curiam opinion. 111 N. Y. Supp. 653.
The reversal was, substantially, on the evidence below. The respondent points to no new facts, adduced on the second trial, as warranting any other conclusion than that reached by this court on appeal from the first judgment.
Consequently, on the authority of that decision, the judgment below is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 N.Y.S. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fehr-v-rosenbaum-nyappterm-1910.