Fehr v. Rosenbaum

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fehr v. Rosenbaum

123 N.Y.S. 917

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fehr v. Rosenbaum. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 N.Y.S. 653 →

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 24, 1910·Published

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

This case has been once tried, and "the complaint dismissed, by a judge of the Municipal Court sitting without a jury. The judgment was reversed by the Appellate Term; the facts and reasons, sufficiently appearing in the per curiam opinion. 111 N. Y. Supp. 653.

The reversal was, substantially, on the evidence below. The respondent points to no new facts, adduced on the second trial, as warranting any other conclusion than that reached by this court on appeal from the first judgment.

Consequently, on the authority of that decision, the judgment below is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

This case has been once tried, and "the complaint dismissed, by a judge of the Municipal Court sitting without a jury. The judgment was reversed by the Appellate Term; the facts and reasons, sufficiently appearing in the per curiam opinion. 111 N. Y. Supp. 653.

The reversal was, substantially, on the evidence below. The respondent points to no new facts, adduced on the second trial, as warranting any other conclusion than that reached by this court on appeal from the first judgment.

Consequently, on the authority of that decision, the judgment below is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Fehr v. Rosenbaum, 123 N.Y.S. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

123 N.Y.S. 917 (Fehr v. Rosenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related