Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Fehn v. State

Fehn v. State

75 S.E. 208, 11 Ga. App. 328, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 387
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1912
Docket4217
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 S.E. 208 (Fehn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fehn v. State, 75 S.E. 208, 11 Ga. App. 328, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 387 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The alleged newly discovered evidence not being merely cumulative or impeaching in its nature, and being of such character as on a second trial would likely produce a different result, the trial court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

J. E. Rosser, W. M. Henry, for plaintiff in error. John W. Bale, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stembridge v. State
65 S.E.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 S.E. 208, 11 Ga. App. 328, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fehn-v-state-gactapp-1912.