Fehn v. State

75 S.E. 208, 11 Ga. App. 328, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 387
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 10, 1912·No. 4217·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The alleged newly discovered evidence not being merely cumulative or impeaching in its nature, and being of such character as on a second trial would likely produce a different result, the trial court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

J. E. Rosser, W. M. Henry, for plaintiff in error. John W. Bale, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fehn v. State, 75 S.E. 208, 11 Ga. App. 328, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 387 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

75 S.E. 208 (Fehn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stembridge v. State
65 S.E.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)