Fehling v. Fehling

202 So. 3d 472, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16508
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 4, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-4391
StatusPublished

This text of 202 So. 3d 472 (Fehling v. Fehling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fehling v. Fehling, 202 So. 3d 472, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16508 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that appellant’s notice of appeal failed to invoke its appellate jurisdiction in a timely manner. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed with the appropriate court within 30 [473]*473days of rendition of the order on appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). Merely mailing the notice or having the notice placed in a post office box within the required time period is not sufficient. Raysor v. Raysor, 706 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Further, the filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Florida courts are required to dismiss an appeal if the notice is not filed within the applicable time limit. See Miami-Dade County v. Pearl, 843 So.2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miami-Dade County v. Peart
843 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Raysor v. Raysor
706 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 So. 3d 472, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fehling-v-fehling-fladistctapp-2016.