Fehling v. Fehling

28 So. 3d 185, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1640, 2010 WL 547159
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2010·No. 1D09-3703·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.490(f); Kelly v. Colston, 977 So.2d 692, 695 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (After a magistrate holds a hearing and files a report, the circuit court has the duty to review the entire case file, examine the evidence presented to the magistrate, and determine whether the magistrates findings of fact and conclusions of law are justified.) (emphasis in original). See generally City of *186 Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBA, 703 So.2d 1066, 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (dismissing appeal of order confirming arbitration award that failed to also enter judgment). Cf. Fort v. Fort, 951 So.2d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (reviewing final order that “adopted the recommendations of the general magistrate and dismissed the action”); Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Fla., Inc. v. Grimmel, 16 So.3d 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (reviewing final order that adopted “each and every recommendation” of general magistrate).

VAN NORTWICK and CLARK, JJ., and BERGER, WENDY, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fehling v. Fehling, 28 So. 3d 185, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1640, 2010 WL 547159 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

28 So. 3d 185 (Fehling v. Fehling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. Colston
977 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Florida, Inc. v. Grimmel
16 So. 3d 167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Fort v. Fort
951 So. 2d 1020 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
City of Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBA
703 So. 2d 1066 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)