Fehling v. Fehling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fehling v. Fehling

28 So. 3d 185, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1640, 2010 WL 547159

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2010

Docket1D09-3703

StatusPublished

This text of 28 So. 3d 185 (Fehling v. Fehling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fehling v. Fehling, 28 So. 3d 185, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1640, 2010 WL 547159 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.490(f); Kelly v. Colston, 977 So.2d 692, 695 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (After a magistrate holds a hearing and files a report, the circuit court has the duty to review the entire case file, examine the evidence presented to the magistrate, and determine whether the magistrates findings of fact and conclusions of law are justified.) (emphasis in original). See generally City of *186 Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBA, 703 So.2d 1066, 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (dismissing appeal of order confirming arbitration award that failed to also enter judgment). Cf. Fort v. Fort, 951 So.2d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (reviewing final order that “adopted the recommendations of the general magistrate and dismissed the action”); Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Fla., Inc. v. Grimmel, 16 So.3d 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (reviewing final order that adopted “each and every recommendation” of general magistrate).

VAN NORTWICK and CLARK, JJ., and BERGER, WENDY, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.490(f); Kelly v. Colston, 977 So.2d 692, 695 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (After a magistrate holds a hearing and files a report, the circuit court has the duty to review the entire case file, examine the evidence presented to the magistrate, and determine whether the magistrates findings of fact and conclusions of law are justified.) (emphasis in original). See generally City of *186 Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBA, 703 So.2d 1066, 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (dismissing appeal of order confirming arbitration award that failed to also enter judgment). Cf. Fort v. Fort, 951 So.2d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (reviewing final order that “adopted the recommendations of the general magistrate and dismissed the action”); Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Fla., Inc. v. Grimmel, 16 So.3d 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (reviewing final order that adopted “each and every recommendation” of general magistrate).

VAN NORTWICK and CLARK, JJ., and BERGER, WENDY, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 So. 3d 185, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1640, 2010 WL 547159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fehling-v-fehling-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack