Feeney v. Burke
98 A. 192, 89 N.J.L. 359, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 325
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court,
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Trenchabd, Bergen, Mjnturn, Black, Terhune, Heppenhetmer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 11.
For reversal—1Slone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feeney v. Burke, 98 A. 192, 89 N.J.L. 359, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 325 (N.J. 1916).
98 A. 192 (Feeney v. Burke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beirne v. Gangemi
181 A.2d 800 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Connors v. City of Bayonne
116 A.2d 48 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)