Feeney Hay Co. v. Trenton Milling Co.

189 Ga. 109
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 11, 1939·No. No. 13004·Published

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

1. If a petition which undertakes to set out a cause of action for either equitable or legal relief, or both, is sufficient for either relief, it will not be dismissed on a general demurrer, but will proceed for the relief appropriate to such of the allegations and prayers as are sufficient.

2. The petition as amended stated facts sufficient to justify a court in its discretion to grant the extraordinary equitable relief prayed for, to wit, an injunction and receiver. Hermann v. Mobley, 172 Ga. 380 (158 S. E. 38) ; Goodroe v. C. L. C. Thomas Warehouse, 185 Ga. 399 (3), 400 (195 S. E. 199). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feeney Hay Co. v. Trenton Milling Co., 189 Ga. 109 (Ga. 1939).

189 Ga. 109 (Feeney Hay Co. v. Trenton Milling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hermann v. Mobley
158 S.E. 38 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Goodroe v. C. L. C. Thomas Warehouse
195 S.E. 199 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)