Feemster v. Johnson
This text of 24 Ky. 68 (Feemster v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
It seems to the court that the judgment in this case having been rendered, on a note for “current paper” for a larger sum than the nominal amount of the note, it is, therefore erroneous. It would have been better too, although, perhaps, not indispensable, that the judgment should have been for Kentucky or commonwealth’s bank paper, thereby giving the debtors the election to pay either, as the contract might have been discharged in either.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, that the judgment may be entered correctly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Ky. 68, 1 J.J. Marsh. 68, 1829 Ky. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feemster-v-johnson-kyctapp-1829.