Feeley v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feeley v. Herman

23 A.D.2d 837, 259 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4160

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 837 (Feeley v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feeley v. Herman, 23 A.D.2d 837, 259 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered October 27, 1964, granting defendant, Sperry Rand Corporation’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination and denying the cross motion for a limited examination, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that plaintiff should have raised his right to procure an examination by taking an appeal from the prior order denying such examination. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered October 27, 1964, granting defendant, Sperry Rand Corporation’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination and denying the cross motion for a limited examination, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that plaintiff should have raised his right to procure an examination by taking an appeal from the prior order denying such examination. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 837, 259 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feeley-v-herman-nyappdiv-1965.