Fee v. Starr
This text of 13 Cal. 170 (Fee v. Starr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Baldwin, J. concurring.
There is in the record no properly authenticated statement or bill of exceptions, setting out the evidence.
The statement in the record is neither signed by the Judge, nor agreed to by the parties, nor does it appear that a copy was ever served on Respondent or his Attorney.
[171]*171The Clerk’s certificate that the statement is the same which was used on the argument of the motion for a new trial, is entitled to no weight, as the Clerk is not authorized by law to verify a statement in that form.
The judgment roll disclosing no irregularities, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Cal. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fee-v-starr-cal-1859.