Fee v. Sharkey
45 A. 1091, 60 N.J. Eq. 446, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 184
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons assigned by Vice-Chancellor Pitney for advising it.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Adams, Vredenburgh — 8.
For reversal — Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins — 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fee v. Sharkey, 45 A. 1091, 60 N.J. Eq. 446, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 184 (N.J. 1900).
45 A. 1091 (Fee v. Sharkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hannan v. Wilson
136 A. 499 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)