Fee v. Sharkey

45 A. 1091, 60 N.J. Eq. 446, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 184
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 5, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons assigned by Vice-Chancellor Pitney for advising it.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Adams, Vredenburgh — 8.

For reversal — Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fee v. Sharkey, 45 A. 1091, 60 N.J. Eq. 446, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 184 (N.J. 1900).

45 A. 1091 (Fee v. Sharkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hannan v. Wilson
136 A. 499 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)