Fee v. Orient Guano Manuf'g Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

Fee v. Orient Guano Manuf'g Co.

44 F. 430, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1881

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

DecidedAugust 19, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 44 F. 430 (Fee v. Orient Guano Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fee v. Orient Guano Manuf'g Co., 44 F. 430, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1881 (circtedny 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

BlatchforDj J.

I concur with the district judge in the views expressed by him in his opinion, filed September 24, 1888. I also agree-[431]*431that the exceptions of the libelants to the commissioner’s report must be overruled; that the libelants Field, Clark, Kidney, Corrigan, Collins, MoGuirk, Early, and Kruger, respectively, must recover the amounts reported by the commissioner in their favor, with interest from the date of the report, May 18, 1889, but that the libelants John Foe, Page, Mitchell, and Pidgoon, respectively, must recover one-half of the amounts reported by the commissioner in their favor, with interest from the date of the report, May 18, 1889; that the libelants recover their costs in the district court, taxed at $208.35; and that neither party recover any costs of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BlatchforDj J.

I concur with the district judge in the views expressed by him in his opinion, filed September 24, 1888. I also agree-[431]*431that the exceptions of the libelants to the commissioner’s report must be overruled; that the libelants Field, Clark, Kidney, Corrigan, Collins, MoGuirk, Early, and Kruger, respectively, must recover the amounts reported by the commissioner in their favor, with interest from the date of the report, May 18, 1889, but that the libelants John Foe, Page, Mitchell, and Pidgoon, respectively, must recover one-half of the amounts reported by the commissioner in their favor, with interest from the date of the report, May 18, 1889; that the libelants recover their costs in the district court, taxed at $208.35; and that neither party recover any costs of this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 F. 430, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fee-v-orient-guano-manufg-co-circtedny-1890.