Fee v. Columbus Borough
This text of 31 A. 1076 (Fee v. Columbus Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Considered in the light of all the testimony properly before the jury, there is no substantial error in either of the excerpts from the learned judge’s charge, recited in the first, second, seventh and eighth specifications; nor do we think there is any error in either of his answers to defendant’s requests for charge specified in the remaining four assignments. Questions of fact, necessarily for the exclusive consideration of the jury, were presented by the testimony and properly submitted to them, with instructions which appear to be substantially accurate and adequate. We find nothing in either of the assignments of error that requires special comment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A. 1076, 168 Pa. 382, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fee-v-columbus-borough-pa-1895.